You must obtain institutional approval from the College and ethics approval from the REB prior to starting research involving human participants at Dawson.

If you have not yet obtained institutional approval, please contact the Research Office for an initial assessment and to discuss your project’s anticipated needs.

Research projects exempt from ethics review:

• rely exclusively on publicly available information about individuals or institutions (Article 2.2). Some research is exempt from REB review because protections are available by other means. Research that relies EXCLUSIVELY on information that is publicly available through a mechanism set out by legislation or regulation and that is protected by law or in the public domain and the individuals to whom the information refers have no reasonable expectation of privacy is exempt from REB review.
• involve observation of people in public places that is not staged by the researcher(s), and do not allow for the identification of the individuals (Article 2.3). Research involving naturalistic observation in public places is exempt from REB review as long as ALL of the following criteria are met:
  • • it does not involve any intervention staged by the researcher,
    • it does not involve direct interaction with the individual or groups,
    • the individuals or groups targeted for observation have no reasonable expectation of privacy and,
    • any dissemination of research results does not allow identification of specific individuals.
• rely exclusively on secondary use of anonymous information (Article 2.4). Research that relies EXCLUSIVELY on secondary use of anonymous information (human or biological) does not require REB review.Anonymous information is not to be confused with anonymized information. Anonymous refers to research data that never had identifiers (e.g. name, student ID, SIN, email, etc.) associated with it at the point of collection. However, if two or more anonymous data sets are linked and there is a reasonable probability that this linkage could generate identifiable information, then REB REVIEW IS REQUIRED.

In unclear situations, it is the REB’s mandate to determine whether ethics review is required. When in doubt, and to ensure ethical standards are consistently upheld, researchers are asked to submit a REB application or a detailed description of the research project and any supporting documents to the REB coordinator. The REB will then determine whether an ethics review is required.

See Article 2.1 of the TCPS 2 (2022).

It is recommended that applications be submitted at least 4 months prior to any time-sensitive deadlines as review turnaround times may vary depending on the availability of reviewers, the volume of applications received by the REB, the level of risk associated with the research project, and whether revisions are required.

After you have submitted your ethics application, Dawson REB Application Form and supporting documents, the REB Coordinator will conduct an administrative review to ensure that the form is filled out properly, and that all relevant supporting documents are included. If there are any items missing or the application is not complete, the REB Coordinator will notify you and you will be asked to resubmit your duly completed application with the required documents.

After the administrative review is complete, your application will then undergo a preliminary REB review and be assigned a delegated or full board review, depending on the risk level.

If you would like to know the status of your submission, please contact the REB coordinator.

Yes. Any research project involving human participants conducted at Dawson College, or in its name, must be submitted to Dawson’s REB for ethics review.

If a researcher has obtained ethics approval from another REB, this approval may factor into the REB Chair’s decision to recommend a delegated ethics review of the project.  However, ethics approval from another REB does not replace the need for an autonomous review by Dawson’s own REB.

External researchers will first need to obtain ethics approval from their home institution, their REB of reference, before the Dawson REB will review their research.

If your study is deemed minimal risk and one of the following situations applies, you do not need to fill out an entirely new application form to seek an ethics approval from the REB at Dawson. Instead, please complete a Minimal Risk Multi-Jurisdictional Form.

• • The principal investigator (PI) is affiliated with an institution other than Dawson College, but participants will be recruited at Dawson College exclusively.
  • The PI is affiliated with an institution other than Dawson College, but participants will be recruited at Dawson College and other institutions.
  • The PI is employed by Dawson College, but the project is carried out to fulfill a requirement for a degree that will be issued by an institution other than Dawson, and participants will be recruited at Dawson college.

See Article 8.1 of the TCPS 2 (2022).

Please note that you must obtain both institutional approval and ethics approval prior to starting research at Dawson.

Yes. If you are recruiting members of the Dawson community (student, faculty member, or staff) your project is subject to an ethics review by the Dawson REB.

You will first need to obtain ethics approval from your home institution (the institution that will be issuing your graduate degree) before submitting an application to the Dawson REB.

You should also contact the research officer as institutional approval may also be required.

Yes. As per Article 2.1 of the TCPS 2 (2022), “[research requiring review] includes course-based research activities, the primary purpose of which is pedagogical, because of the possible risks to those recruited to participate in such activities, and the fact that, from their perspective, such activities may appear indistinguishable from those that meet this Policy’s definition of research”.

However, ethics review of minimal risk course-based research (CBR) activities with a primarily pedagogical purpose can be delegated to non-REB members. Please visit the CBR page for updates on the development of the Dawson CBR guidelines.

See Article 6.12 of the TCPS 2 (2022).